NGC/IC Project Restoration Effort
(This is a very very beta version)
NGC5697
Basic Information
Location and Magnitude
Right Ascension: 14:36:32.0
Declination: +41:41:7
Constellation: BOO
Visual Magnitude: 13.8
Historic Information
Discoverer: Herschel W.
Year of discovery: 1787
Discovery aperture: 18.7
Observational
Summary description: F, vS, R, bM, 4 B st p
Sub-type: Sb
Corwin's Notes
=====
NGC 5697 = IC 4471, which see. There are two numbers on this galaxy because
the Herschel's positions differ by 43 seconds of time (WH is closer, but keep
reading), and their declinations are five arcmin off the real declinations.
So, Bigourdan was understandably confused by the field. IC 4471 has that part
of the story.
However, an NGC note reflects another confusion between NGC 5696 and N5697
that arises when comparing the Herschels' positions. WH's relative positions
place the galaxies southwest-northeast (this is correct), while JH's put them
northwest-southeast. JH's RA's are at fault, and he marks both of them with
plus-minus signs. His declination for N5697 is also so marked, while that for
N5696 is flagged with a colon. He also notes that the "RA [for N5696] is by
working list", but there is some error in the reduction (CH's?) for that list
as that RA is 20 seconds smaller than WH's, and 28 seconds smaller than the
GC's and NGC's. Where did this RA come from? Whatever the answer, WH's
reduced positions (from his discovery observations) are closer in both cases,
but are still five arcmin off in declination.
In the Scientific Papers, Dreyer notes that WH saw both objects in Sweep 725
on 9 April 1787. Here, WH has N5696 (II 648) 36 seconds preceding, 10 arcmin
south of N5697 (II 675). This is reasonably close to the real offsets (in
1787) of 26.3 seconds and 8 arcmin 27 arcsec.
JH made the best of the situation he could, and Dreyer faithfully copied it
into the NGC. Fortunately, the positions are not too far off the real values,
and there are no other galaxies nearby to further confuse the issue. So, the
identities in the NGC can be adopted pretty much as they are. The 1860 NGC
positions should read 14 31 32, 47 33.7 for N5696, and 14 31 06, 47 42.3 for
N5697.
Steve's Notes
=====
NGC 5697
17.5" (6/27/98): faint, fairly small, elongated 2:1 SSW-NNE, 0.8'x0.4', weak concentration. Follows a distinctive trapezoid of mag 10-12 stars (brighter stars form the longer 3' base). Also a mag 14.5 star is 1.5' NW and a mag 15 star is close WSW [double on DSS]. Fainter of pair with NGC 5696 10' NE.