NGC/IC Project Restoration Effort
(This is a very very beta version)
NGC1980
Basic Information
Location and Magnitude
Right Ascension: 5:35:25.0
Declination: -5:54:54
Constellation: ORI
Visual Magnitude:
Historic Information
Discoverer: Herschel W.
Year of discovery: 1783
Discovery aperture: 12.0
Observational
Summary description: vF, vvL, ι 44 Orionis inv
Sub-type: *
Corwin's Notes
=====
NGC 1980. This very faint nebula around iota Orionis has been the subject of
some controversy recently (Steve Gottlieb brought this to my attention late in
October of 2014). WH first suggested its existence early in 1786 (Sweeps 517
on 31 January, and 529 on 24 February). Could WH have really seen it, or is
his "nebulosity" simply the result of the overlapping coronae of the several
bright stars in the area, not least that of iota itself?
Here are WH's notes:
Sweep 517: "Iota Orionis seems with its neighbouring stars to be involved
in milky nebulosity, but it is so faint and the number of stars makes the
field so bright, that I cannot assure myself; though I compared this spot
with the preceding and foloowing ones." Just four minutes before this
observation began, WH noted "Very clear" in the sweep.
Sweep 529: "Iota, certainly affected; but no more than what the tinge of
the bottom in this neighbourhood will account for." Again, just seven
minutes this time, WH noted "Clear and dark" in the sweep.
Wolfgang, after a long study of WH's observations of nebulae, believes that
WH's suggestions of nebulosity are visual illusions brought about by the stars
in the area. He points out, correctly, that "The southern part of M 42 has a
very low surface brightness." I'm inclined to agree, but don't want to
dismiss the observations entirely.
For the record, JH recorded only "i Orionis involved in a feeble neb 3' diam"
on 8 January 1831; and Bigourdan says "Not seen" on 27 December 1886, and "I
cannot see nebulosity around this bright star, which is BD -6 1241," on 15
January 1896.
So, given the uncertainty, I am keeping the number "NGC 1980" as a possibility
for future observers to confirm or refute as they please. Its position is
certainly not a problem: WH is clear that it surrounds iota Orionis. Only
the visibility of the faint nebulosity here, the southern reaches of M 42, is
in question.
Steve's Notes
=====
NGC 1980
13.1" (1/28/84): very faint, large nebulosity of low surface brightness surrounding Iota Orionis (V = 2.8). Very difficult to distinguish from glare of Iota. M42 lies 30' N.