NGC/IC Project Restoration Effort

(This is a very very beta version)

NGC1909

 

Basic Information


Location and Magnitude


Right Ascension: 5:4:54.0
Declination: -7:15:0
Constellation: ERI
Visual Magnitude:

Historic Information


Discoverer: Herschel W.
Year of discovery: 1786
Discovery aperture: 18.7

Observational


Summary description: eL, strongly susp (2° in PD)
Sub-type: RN

Corwin's Notes

===== NGC 1909. WH has one observation of this "Strongly suspected nebulosity of very great extent." He makes its size "Not less than 2 deg 11 arcmin of PD and 26 sec of RA in time." These numbers come from his offsets from Rigel: 11m 09s east to 11m 35s east, and 1 deg 19 arcmin north to 52 arcmin south. While this whole area is covered with a very diffused, very low surface brightness nebulosity, I do not see anything that WH could have seen easily. In particular, there is no nebula stretched out north to south as WH describes. However, at about the right distance WEST of Rigel, there is such a nebula, IC 2118. It is bright enough that WH might have seen it during his sweeps, and it more or less matches his description. So, I am going to suggest, pending visual confirmation, that IC 2118 is the object WH found, and that he somehow confused "east" and "west" in his log book. That is what I wrote in the 1990s when I went over the field on the first Palomar Sky Survey prints. However, I now have CH's fair copies of the sweeps available and find that my idea of the nebulosity west of Rigel being WH's object is impossible. WH observed the nebulosity at least 11 minutes AFTER Rigel had left the field, so NGC 1909 cannot be west of the star. So, there is no possibility that WH's object is IC 2118. So what DID WH see? Probably nothing beyond optical (reflections of bright stars, fogging of his eyepiece or mirror, faint clouds or sky glow) or physiological/psychological (aberrations within his eye, fatigue, hunger, etc) effects.

Steve's Notes

===== NGC 1909 See observing notes for IC 2118.